How to calculate cost per hire: formula, worked example and what to include

A step-by-step method you can run in a spreadsheet this afternoon, plus the mistakes that make cost per hire look better or worse than it is.

The short answer

Cost per hire is the total amount you spend on recruiting in a period divided by the number of people you hired in that period. The cost per hire formula is: (external costs + internal costs) / total hires. External costs are what you pay outside parties, such as job boards, agencies, background checks and assessment tools. Internal costs are what you spend inside the company, mostly recruiter and hiring manager time, plus referral bonuses and your share of recruiting systems. A team that spent $58,700 on recruiting in a quarter and made 12 hires has a cost per hire of about $4,892. The hard part isn't the division. It's counting the same costs, the same way, every time.

The cost per hire formula, step by step

SHRM, the HR professional association, frames the calculation around external and internal costs. Here is how to run it in practice.

  1. Pick a period. A quarter or a year works best. Use the same period for costs and hires. A hire counts in the period the person accepted or started, so pick one rule and keep it.
  2. Choose your scope. All hires, or one segment such as engineering, hourly roles or a single location. Segment numbers are far more useful than a company-wide average.
  3. Total your external costs for that scope and period, from invoices and card statements.
  4. Total your internal costs, using time estimates and loaded pay rates (salary plus benefits and taxes).
  5. Divide the sum by the number of hires in scope.
  6. Write down your rules: what you included, how you estimated time, and which hires counted. Next quarter's number is only comparable if the rules match.

What to include: internal and external costs

Cost typeCommon line itemsWhere to find it
ExternalJob board and social ads, sponsored postsAd platform invoices
ExternalAgency and search feesAgency invoices
ExternalBackground checks, drug tests, credential checksVendor invoices
ExternalAssessment, interview and screening softwareSubscriptions, prorated to the period
ExternalCandidate travel, career fairs, campus eventsExpense reports
ExternalRelocation and sign-on bonuses (if your policy counts them)Payroll and finance
InternalRecruiter and sourcer pay, loaded, for time spent on hiringHR budget and time estimates
InternalHiring manager and interviewer timeInterview counts times hours times loaded rate
InternalEmployee referral bonusesPayroll
InternalShare of ATS and recruiting systemsSoftware invoices, prorated

Two judgment calls cause most arguments. First, sign-on and relocation bonuses: some teams count them, others treat them as compensation. Either is defensible if you are consistent and say which you chose. Second, interviewer time: it is real cost, but it is often left out because nobody tracks it. Estimate it anyway, using a simple count of interviews times average length.

Leave out onboarding and training after day one. Those belong to a separate metric. Mixing them in makes cost per hire jump whenever you improve onboarding, which sends the wrong signal.

A worked cost per hire example

Here is a hypothetical 300-person company that made 12 hires in one quarter. The numbers are illustrative, not benchmarks.

Line itemHow we got itCost
Job adsInvoices for the quarter$6,000
Agency feeOne senior hire through an agency$18,000
Background checks12 checks at $50$600
Screening and assessment softwareQuarter of annual subscriptions$2,100
Candidate travelTwo finalist visits$1,500
External subtotal$28,200
Recruiter timeOne recruiter, $112,500 loaded a year, quarter share, 80% on these roles$22,500
Interviewer time60 interview hours at a $75 loaded hourly rate$4,500
Referral bonusesTwo referrals at $1,000$2,000
ATS shareQuarter of annual license$1,500
Internal subtotal$30,500
Total$28,200 + $30,500$58,700
Cost per hire$58,700 / 12 hiresabout $4,892

Notice what drives the number. One agency hire is almost a third of total spend. Without it, the other 11 hires average about $3,700 each. That is why one blended figure can mislead. Report agency and direct hires separately, and senior and entry-level roles separately.

Benchmarks: use them carefully

Published cost per hire benchmarks are scarce and often old. SHRM's Human Capital Benchmarking Report, covering fiscal year 2015 and published in August 2016, reported an average cost per hire of $4,129, from a random sample of SHRM members. That is a decade-old, all-roles average across very different employers. Treat it as a rough reference point, not a target.

A better benchmark is your own history. Track cost per hire by quarter for each segment, and look at the trend next to two other numbers:

  • Time to fill. Cutting cost by slowing down hiring often costs more in lost output than it saves.
  • Quality of hire. First-year retention and hiring manager ratings tell you whether cheaper hiring is still good hiring.

How interview automation changes the interview-cost line

For many teams, the largest controllable internal cost is first-round screening. Take the example above and assume the team screened 240 candidates in the quarter, 20 per hire. A 30-minute recruiter phone screen plus 15 minutes of scheduling and notes is 45 minutes. At a loaded rate of about $54 an hour (the $112,500 recruiter), that is about $41 per screen, or about $9,700 a quarter.

Now move the first round to an AI interview that candidates take on their own schedule. NTRVSTA's public pricing works out to about $8.74 per interview on its Growth plan at 80 interviews a month. At 240 interviews a quarter (80 a month), that is about $2,100 in software. If a recruiter then spends 10 minutes reviewing each report, add about $2,160 in time. The quarter's first-round cost drops from about $9,700 to about $4,260, roughly $450 less per hire.

Be honest about what that saving is. Recruiter salary is fixed, so the roughly $5,500 is mostly freed capacity rather than cash, unless it lets you avoid a new recruiting hire or an agency fee. That is often where the real money is: one avoided agency placement in the example above is worth more than a year of screening savings. See our AI interview pricing guide for per-interview costs across vendors, and compare plans on our pricing page.

Common mistakes

  • Counting only invoices. External-only cost per hire flatters teams with big internal recruiting functions.
  • Mixing periods. Costs from one quarter divided by hires from another produce noise.
  • One blended number. Executive and hourly hires belong in different buckets.
  • Chasing the number down. Cutting structured interviews to save time can raise turnover. A consistent interview scorecard protects quality while you cut cost.
  • Ignoring volume. Fixed costs spread over more hires lower cost per hire without any real efficiency gain. Watch total spend too.

If you hire at high volume, our list of high-volume hiring software covers tools built for that flow.

Questions

What is the formula for cost per hire?

Add your external recruiting costs and your internal recruiting costs for a period, then divide by the number of hires made in that same period. Use one consistent period, such as a quarter or a year, and the same cost categories every time you measure.

Should recruiter salaries be included in cost per hire?

Yes, the share of recruiter and recruiting team pay spent on hiring belongs in internal costs. Leaving it out makes cost per hire look far lower than it is, especially for teams that hire mostly through their own recruiters rather than agencies.

What is a good cost per hire?

There is no single good number, because it varies with role level, location and how much you rely on agencies. SHRM's benchmarking survey for fiscal 2015 reported an average of $4,129, but that figure is old. Your own trend over time, by role type, is the more useful benchmark.

How do we lower cost per hire without hurting quality?

Look at the biggest line items first, usually agency fees and recruiter time. Improve job posts so fewer unqualified people apply, structure and automate first-round screens, and track quality of hire next to cost so savings don't come from worse hires.

Curious what your own first-round numbers would look like? Book a 20-minute demo and bring your hiring volume, or try a sample AI interview first.

Sources

NTRVSTA
‍